Tilbury Fort
Tilbury Fort is a hugely impressive structure, and shows how the traditional
British castle-fortress evolved to cope with the demands of modern
warfare. Built in the late 17th century to the design of Sir Bernard
de Gomme, Chief Engineer and Surveyor General of Ordinance to Charles
II, Tilbury Fort was sited over an earlier Blockhouse dating from the reign of
Henry VIII. With another fort, on the opposite bank of the river at
Gravesend, it was intended to provide the first line of defence for
London. Even today, Tilbury Fort remains virtually unaltered and survives
as probably the best example of its type in the country.
Following a regular pentagon in shape, Tilbury Fort was planned with four
massive diamond-shaped bastions at each corner, and a further centrally
placed bastion in the southern wall facing the river (this southernmost
bastion was, for whatever reason, never built). The four huge bastions
projected out from the main curtain walls, and their distinctive shape
was designed to allow a spread of covering fire along the adjacent
curtain walls, across the moat, and over the outer defences. Both the
bastions and the curtain walls that joined them were low to the ground.
Covered by turf ramparts, they were not only very strong, but also
extremely difficult to see and hit.
The entire landward
structure was then completely surrounded by a 'V' shaped
moat, the level of which could be controlled by a series of sluices,
with the River Thames protecting the southern elevation in a similar
fashion. Projecting from the northern curtain wall was a bridge that
led to a triangular-shaped island, situated within the inner moat.
This was known as a 'Ravelin' and was designed with two
main purposes in mind. Firstly, to protect the 'Landport Gate' (Tilbury
Fort's northern entrance) from direct fire, and then to provide covering
fire to any breach in the northern curtain wall or bastions. From the
Ravelin another bridge allowed access to a complex series of covered
passages, which extended to almost the entire perimeter of the bastions
and curtain. These passages would allow infantrymen, carrying small
arms, to fire across an outer moat encircling the entire landward complex.
Beyond the Ravelin, but sited as a triangular island within the outer
moat, was a Redan. This was connected to the mainland via a causeway
and formed the main entrance to Tilbury Fort from the landward side. Originally
it would have contained a small Redoubt, but this has since disappeared.
The general principle was that most attacks would be from land, making
the northern entrance the most vulnerable point. The defences were
necessarily heavier here, and designed so that as each line of defence
fell, the garrison could fall back to the next one, until all troops
were back in the main fort and the drawbridges over the inner moat
could be raised. Internally, Tilbury Fort comprises of a large parade
ground some 2.5 acres in size. To the north, either side of the Landport
Gate, are two rectangular buildings which served as powder magazines.
Built c1716, these have been altered over the years, but one of their
most notable features is the large copper doors, now green in colour
due to weathering.
Running parallel to the west and east elevations of the
fort were two rows of barracks. The eastern 'Officers Barrack' still
survives, although much altered over the years, and now forms a fine
looking row of terraced houses. The soldier's barracks were less
fortunate. Having been severely damaged during a Second World War bombing
raid, they were subsequently demolished. Other buildings to the north-east
of these barracks, which would have included a mess, hospital and kitchens,
also suffered the same fate. To the south-west, the Guardroom with
the fort Chapel above, and the beautifully ornate 'Water Gate' are
two of the original buildings to survive.
The south-east corner of Tilbury Fort is where the most obvious remodelling
work has been undertaken. During the late 18th century on the advice
of a military engineer, Thomas Hyde Page, the first programme was put
in place, followed by the more substantial works of c1868 that the
visitor largely sees today. |